Shushan Qixia

Full Version: Make Full Utilization Of Your Articles Source Package
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Now, there is not necessarily something wrong with this, I just think that authors who are doing this are missing out on possible traffic and/or customers. Such source boxes will only benefit their site ranks in a...

I run an article service on my site, and I am seeing an ever-increasing number of articles being presented, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is most likely as a result of increasing amount of PLR articles and material that's becoming available. To study more, we know people take a view at: read more.

Now, there's certainly not something wrong with this, I just believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on potential traffic and/or customers. Such resource boxes will simply gain their site ranks in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.

Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out is as follows.

Much of the traffic to my post listing comes from search engines, by people looking for information on a specific topic. Now, this user types within their keywords, presses o-n the search field, and is given a summary of relevant sites. They chose one, and are taken up to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's reference box at the conclusion of the article to see what else they've to say on this issue. There, they locate a link to some site promotion cellular ringers. May be the reader planning to be impressed, or interested in this? Not very likely. They would like to check out snowboarding, not modify their phone. In my opinion among three things will happen then:

The audience leaves the whole site in disgust. Visiting powered by certainly provides tips you might give to your family friend.

The viewer clicks on a link to a related report.

The viewer clicks on a relevant Google AdSense (or similar contextual advertising) offer.

They do not click the author's source link. That is a possible client lost, quite probably for good.

Yes, put a link in to your site in the source package, but many article sites allow several links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s associated with the article subject too, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the client.

'But my site doesn't have anything regarding that matter onto it'!

You can add something which does. Put an article listing, and have the source field saying 'To see more articles on this issue, just click here.' Add a web service, and have the writing say 'To look at links to web sites with this issue, just click here.' Or just go to ClickBank, look for related projects, and have a link to them, with the link saying something such as 'If you prefer to learn more on this subject, purchase this product.' Ideally, not just a direct url to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one. To discover more, we know you have a look at: linklicious alternative.

Using this method, you still get that connect to your website that you were after originally, but, additionally, you've the opportunity to generate income from your audience in a brand new way. A win-win situation. Plus, you do not seem like someone simply submitting purchased content on any subject only for the sake of the backlink it'll give you. If you have an opinion about finance, you will seemingly need to compare about linklicious.me discount. A much more professional look. Is not it worth making the effort to make better use of your source field?.